[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Hamada crustal ridge, et al

To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Subject: Re: Hamada crustal ridge, et al
From: David Weir <dweir@mail.mco.bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 1997 21:56:16 -0400
Old-X-Envelope-To: <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
References: <01bcd502$2b6c4ce0$LocalHost@default>
Reply-To: dweir@mail.mco.bellsouth.net
Resent-Date: Thu, 9 Oct 1997 21:53:50 -0400 (EDT)
Resent-From: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Resent-Message-ID: <"kFOkLB.A.xPD.fpYP0"@mu.pair.com>
Resent-Sender: meteorite-list-request@meteoritecentral.com

Serguei,
I have to agree with Walt on this idea; I would rather have new material
distibuted with a tentative classification than wait for it to be sold
out to institutions first. However, I do believe the Labenne EH3
location should be described by this late date. (Only my opinion.)
David

Follow-Ups:

Ambiguous locations

From: Martin Horejsi <martinh@isu.edu>

References:

Re: Hamada crustal ridge, et al

From: "Serguei Vassiliev" <heliodor@brailcom.cz>

Prev by Date: Follow-up to: Meteor over El Paso, Texas
Next by Date: Mars Pathfinder Team Paints An Earth-Like Picture Of Early Mars
Prev by thread: Re: Hamada crustal ridge, et al
Next by thread: Ambiguous locations
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread