[meteorite-list] tektites....and the Nakhla dog
From: meteorites_at_space.com <meteorites_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu Apr 22 09:43:30 2004 Message-ID: <20010710153050.15483.cpmta_at_c000.snv.cp.net> John, With all due respects, I, and many others think that the tektite issue is a very important one for discussion and certainly a hot topic with many researchers today-- not in all in the same box as the Nakhla dog. The dog is dead-- Long live the dog! Steve Schoner. On Tue, 10 July 2001, John Gwilliam wrote: > > <html> > It's time to put this tektite subject in a box and bury it next to the > Nakhla dog issue. They will both certainly find a way to dig > themselves back to the surface and reappear on this list six months from > now. There has to be something else to talk about out there in > cyberland...<br> > <br> > John Gwilliam<br> > <br> > At 09:41 PM 7/9/01 -0600, Joseph Hum wrote:<br> > <br> > <blockquote type=cite cite>we do not know enough about the moon<br> > believe it or not, to rule it out!<br> > our sampling endeavors are laughable<br> > we wait around to hope to find more meteorites<br> > we should have gone to the moon and stayed<br> > the finicky wishy washy public lost enthusiasm<br> > to generate the political will<br> > it was from many points of view a major mistake<br> > not to have initiated and maintained a base there<br> > <br> > Regards, Karl<br> > <br> > <br> > <br> > <br> > <br> > --- Joseph Hum<br> > --- > <a href="mailto:jkarlhum_at_earthlink.net">jkarlhum@earthlink.net</a><br> > --- EarthLink: It's your Internet.<br> > <br> > </blockquote><br> > <div>John Gwilliam Meteorites</div> > <div>PO Box 26854</div> > <div>Tempe AZ 85285</div> > <a href="http://www.meteoriteimpact.com/" EUDORA=AUTOURL>http://www.meteoriteimpact.com</a> > </html> ___________________________________________________________________ Join the Space Program: Get FREE E-mail at http://www.space.com. Received on Tue 10 Jul 2001 11:30:50 AM PDT |
 StumbleUpon del.icio.us reddit Yahoo MyWeb
|