[meteorite-list] Felix... CO3.2 or CO3.4???????

From: Dave Schultz <indy1996_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu Apr 22 10:22:37 2004
Message-ID: <20030612033555.70285.qmail_at_web40501.mail.yahoo.com>

  Thanks to everyone for finally settling the "Felix
mystery" as one well known list member wrote to me. It
really had me perplexed for awhile. Have a great
evening everyone!!!!!
                                       Dave


--- Jeff Grossman <jgrossman_at_usgs.gov> wrote:
> No way Felix is 3.2. Jones and Scott (1990) had it
> at 3.2, but more recent
> data show it to be significantly higher. Kainsaz is
> a solid 3.2, and all
> properties of Felix show it to be more equilibrated
> than Kainsaz. Data on
> TL (Sears) and on amoeboid olivine inclusions
> (Chizmadia) show Felix to be
> more like 3.3-3.4. My own studies of matrix in CO's
> support 3.4 for
> Felix. So, call it 3.3/3.4.
>
> jeff
>
> 02:38 PM 6/11/2003 -0700, Tom aka James Knudson
> wrote:
> >Hello All Dave wrote;
> >" I`ve talked to two notable and well respected
> list members about
> >this and one says he found it listed as a CO3.2 and
> >the other found it listed as a CO3.4. "
> >
> >Easy solution, Split the difference and call it a
> CO3.3
> >Thanks, To
> >The proudest member of the IMCA 6168
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: Dave Schultz <indy1996_at_yahoo.com>
> >To: <meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com>
> >Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:12 PM
> >Subject: [meteorite-list] Felix... CO3.2 or
> CO3.4???????
> >
> >
> > > Greetings Listees. I have this nice piece of
> Felix
> > > in my collection that I purchased a few years
> back,
> > > and with the receipt it was classified as a
> CO3.4, but
> > > I looked it up in the book "Meteorites from A to
> Z"
> > > which is a marvelous reference book that I use
> alot,
> > > and it says it is classified as a CO3.2. I`ve
> talked
> > > to two notable and well respected list members
> about
> > > this and one says he found it listed as a CO3.2
> and
> > > the other found it listed as a CO3.4. Is there
> some
> > > kind of conflict with this particular meteorite
> in its
> > > classification, or just a couple of misprints?
> Thanks
> > > for your help in advance!!!
> > > Dave IMCA #2725
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > __________________________________
> > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync
> to Outlook(TM).
> > > http://calendar.yahoo.com
> > >
> > > ______________________________________________
> > > Meteorite-list mailing list
> > > Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
> > >
>
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >______________________________________________
> >Meteorite-list mailing list
> >Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
>
>http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
> Dr. Jeffrey N. Grossman phone: (703) 648-6184
> US Geological Survey fax: (703) 648-6383
> 954 National Center
> Reston, VA 20192, USA
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
>
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM).
http://calendar.yahoo.com
Received on Wed 11 Jun 2003 11:35:55 PM PDT