[meteorite-list] Semarkona - type specimen? (Clarification)

From: pkmorgan_at_rmci.net <pkmorgan_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu Apr 22 10:25:37 2004
Message-ID: <65451.156.153.254.10.1052410681.squirrel_at_webmail.velocitus.net>

I would like to clarify that I was in no way questioning the integrity of
Michael or how the specimen was represented. I believe at least one NWA
(505 I think) had been recently "reclassified" and was wondering if the .0
classification stuck to this one.

Phil

>
> Dr. Grossman recently stated that "Semarkona is significantly less
> metamorphosed (than Bishunpur), and is still the reigning champ in this
> department."
>
> If I recall correctly, Michael Blood was listing "the new type specimen
> for LL3.0" in his auction this last February. Is/was it? And, just out
> of curiosity, what NWA number was finally assigned to it?
>
> Thanks and Regards to all,
> Phil
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
> http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Received on Thu 08 May 2003 12:18:01 PM PDT


Help support this free mailing list:



StumbleUpon
del.icio.us
reddit
Yahoo MyWeb