[meteorite-list] Question about oriented meteorites

From: Comcast Mail <bobe5531_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Sun Dec 5 23:27:25 2004
Message-ID: <003601c4db4b$a663b940$6400a8c0_at_aoldsl.net>

Well,

The Orientated form should only be used in the word "Orientation ".I dont
think Orientated is even a word. Even though a few on the list use that form

Oriented is the proper way to describe a meteorite that had a stablized
flight path.

Just my 2 cents

Bob E
----- Original Message -----
From: Robert Woolard <meteoritefinder_at_yahoo.com>
To: <meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2004 10:02 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] Question about oriented meteorites


> Hello List and Mike,
>
> Mike just posted this a short while ago:
>
> *************************************
>
> " Subject: Oriented meteorite listed now.
>
>
> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2291946404
>
>
> Here it is, just loaded.
> Mike "
>
> ************************************
>
> First of all...... WOW!! Awesome specimen, Mike!
>
> Secondly, this is a good time to ask a question that
> I've wondered about now and then. I, too would have
> used the exact word " oriented " to describe this
> stone, and I know that is correct. But I often see
> other list members using the term "orientated" (with
> an extra "-at-"in the word). So my question is: Are
> both terms proper, or is "oriented" the ONLY correct
> term to use to describe such a meteorite as this?
>
> Thanks for any help with this question,
>
> Robert Woolard
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone.
> http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo
> ______________________________________________
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Received on Sun 05 Dec 2004 11:25:42 PM PST