[meteorite-list] Congratulations Adam!

From: Adam Hupe <raremeteorites_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Fri Nov 12 21:49:31 2004
Message-ID: <008801c4c928$a0dc8d60$6401a8c0_at_c1720188a>

Nelson,

Everything I stated is accurate except calling NWA 1836, NWA 1838, a simple
mistake which I gladly own up to. We turned over the lab results of
meteorites we studied for Habibi when you acquired the stones and we were
not compensated for doing so. I would say this is classifying your stones
for free. Anyway, Why are you using the NWA 1877 and NWA 1110 designations
on your web site?

All the best,

Adam

----- Original Message -----
From: "Nelson" <pinwalla_at_epix.net>
To: <meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2004 6:19 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] Congratulations Adam!


> Dear List and Adam, I see nothing in the abstract that says I am
incorrect.
> I stated that I paid to have the said meteorites classified and that at
the
> time of their classifying I had the main masses. We all know that this can
> and does usually change. Congrats on your piece of 1817, although I'm not
> clear on how you don't require your own classification number. As for
1827,
> all others are pairings so that is correct. As far as the abstract goes it
> says nothing at all about 1836, which you incorrectly called 1838.
Actually,
> I only announced that I paid for these, because in one of your posts you
> (falsely)stated you paid for over a dozen of mine. I still don't know how
> that could happen, since all the over 50 I've paid to classify I got
> directly billed and paid. Curious, could it be you might have erred? At
any
> rate I appreciate your vehement efforts to keep us all on track. You're
> quite a guy! Thanks Nels
>
>
> ______________________________________________
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Received on Fri 12 Nov 2004 09:29:36 PM PST