AW: [meteorite-list] Most important meteorite?

From: GERALD FLAHERTY <grf2_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Tue Nov 16 21:20:52 2004
Message-ID: <013601c4cc4c$14cfa5b0$6401a8c0_at_dawnjerry>

Excellent Point Walter,
Jerry
----- Original Message -----
From: "Walter Branch" <branchw_at_bellsouth.net>
Cc: <meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 10:41 AM
Subject: Re: AW: [meteorite-list] Most important meteorite?


> Hi Martin,
>
> Yes. That is why I think ALH84001 is the most important meteorite to
> date.
> Not because of the tangibles (the jury is still out) but because of the
> intangibles. ALH84001 made us all (meteorite enthusiasts or not) think of
> the origins of life and the definition of life, focused attention on rocks
> from space, focused attention on the planet Mars (and the upcoming Mars
> pathfinder mission) and heightened awareness of things outside this planet
>
> -Walter
>
> -----------------------------------------------------
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <martinh_at_isu.edu>
> To: "J?rn Koblitz" <koblitz_at_microfab.de>
> Cc: "Adam Hupe" <raremeteorites_at_comcast.net>; "Walter Branch"
> <branchw_at_bellsouth.net>; <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 8:48 AM
> Subject: Re: AW: [meteorite-list] Most important meteorite?
>
>
> J?rn kindly wrote:
>
>> Most important meteorite: ALH 84001 or NWA 3133?
>>
>> I think it is difficult to say and is always biased by the personal
>> preferences of the collector or scientist,
>> but there is a fairly objective measure (at least for scientific
>> importance): the number of publications on a specific meteorite.
>
> Hi J?rn and All,
>
> I struggled with this same question in my lastest column in Meteorite
> Magazine. I reviewed meteorite books counting the number of times
> particular
> meteorites were referenced in their historical or scientific context. My
> focus was on those meteorites that were instrumental in changing our
> collective understanding of meteorites. I narrowed the pool further based
> upon significant contributions compared to supporting contributions. Sure,
> the list of suspects could be longer, but I doubt it could be any shorter.
>
> As for ALH84001, I believe the most important contributions it has made
> are
> that ALH84001: 1) was the focus of a US Presidential p
> ress conference, 2) forced us to (yet again) adjust our collective
> understanding of evidence of life, and 3) definded a period of meteorite
> studies that involved widespread popular discussion that (my poetic
> license
> here) had not been seen since L'Aigle.
>
> I did not mention the particular specimens in the article here. Sorry
> about
> that, but that is what purchasing a subscription is all about
>
> Meteorite Magazine subscription info _at_:
>
> http://www.meteor.co.nz/
>
> Cheers,
>
> Martin H
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
Received on Tue 16 Nov 2004 09:21:00 PM PST