[meteorite-list] Does this NWA look familiar to anyone?

From: joseph_town_at_att.net <joseph_town_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu Jan 27 18:00:20 2005
Message-ID: <012720052300.19530.41F9727F0008C32E00004C4A21603762230299019BA1089F0A9C0106_at_att.net>

Darren,

If this dealer screwed you by omission you have ever right to beef, not much recourse other than that though. I just wonder why he advertised it as unclassified and sent it with an NWA 869 label. Maybe he is confused but I doubt it.

Bill


 -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: Darren Garrison <cynapse_at_charter.net>
> On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 14:12:16 -0500, Darren Garrison <cynapse_at_charter.net> wrote:
>
> >I've just bought what to me is a very interesting looking unclassified NWA
> piece, and I was
> >wondering it looks distinctivly like any numbered NWA find to anyone-- in other
> words, is it a piece
> >from a known find. It has a very dark, possibly greenish matrix, brecciation,
> and as far as I can
> >tell from the photos, it seem to have a low metal content. I of course can
> take much better photos
> >when it reaches me, but I was hoping it might jump out at someone.
> >
> >http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=6506068469
>
> Update on this: before the piece arrived I was browsing Ebay and came across a
> seller with several
> slices of "NWA 787" which looked very similar to my unknown piece. I did a
> quick Google search,
> though, and found that NWA 787 is a probable synonym for NWA 869.
>
> So the lot of pieces (I bought several other items from the seller at the same
> time) arrived today,
> and the very card that came with it labeled it as NWA 869! So I'm torn on this
> issue. While on the
> one hand it seems to me pretty dishonest by the seller to clearly call it
> unclassified in the
> auction (possibly as an deliberate attempt to make it seem more unusual rather
> than a simple
> mistake), on the other hand it still is a beautiful piece with significant flow
> features and is
> probably well worth the slightly less than 50 cents per gram that I paid for it.
> (Which is more
> than three times more than I have paid for NWA 869 in the past, but still
> cheaper than the $3-ish
> per gram the other seller wanted for the similar "NWA 787".)
>
> Look at these scans I made of the piece now that I have it (actual piece not
> quite as contrasty as
> scan makes it look).
>
> http://webpages.charter.net/garrison6328/nwa869_orientedslice_top.jpg
>
> http://webpages.charter.net/garrison6328/nwa869_orientedslice_bottom.jpg
>
> So how would you handle this-- be upset with the seller for calling it
> "unclassified" when it was
> NWA 869, or just be happy with the piece and let it slide?
> ______________________________________________
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Received on Thu 27 Jan 2005 06:00:16 PM PST