[meteorite-list] meteor-wrong (most likely)

From: j.divelbiss_at_att.net <j.divelbiss_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Sun Jul 17 17:07:13 2005
Message-ID: <071720052107.24234.42DAC87A0008D93600005EAA21602810609C9C070D040A90070BD206_at_att.net>

Jim and Bill,

This meteor-wrong has been studied extensively. I believe the consensus of many to date is that it is terrestrial, and possibly man-made. Matt Morgan was involved in one such study and that reference is somewhere in the archives. Here is a statement from the meteorite society.

http://meteoriticalsociety.org/bulletin/shirokovsky.pdf

JD


-------------- Original message from Bill Southern <Nugget-Shooter_at_direcway.com>: --------------


> The photo came from an ebay ad that ended yesterday and I would guess he has
> more there for sale.
>
> Bill
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From:
> To:
> Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2005 11:16 AM
> Subject: [meteorite-list] meteor-wrong
>
>
> >
> > Bill, I have had the same question. Now to me it looks like the real
> > thing. In fact I would like a piece of it! Any addresses to send for
> > one? If it is a meteor-wrong it is a good one. Perhaps it is totaly
> > different! New things are being found all the time. New fish, new bugs,
> > new plants, giant geode caves, etc. why not new meteorites?
> > ______________________________________________
> > Meteorite-list mailing list
> > Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
> > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
> >
>
>
> ______________________________________________
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Received on Sun 17 Jul 2005 05:07:07 PM PDT