[meteorite-list] guess the meteorte (was Re: Kansas Legal Debate: Creation, Evolution andIntelligent Design)

From: Darren Garrison <cynapse_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Sat May 14 13:03:56 2005
Message-ID: <44cc8118ni48gaub7bfgk9bv0hpmnbdppv_at_4ax.com>

So, in the piece I referenced before on the ID-supporting meteorite collector, it has a photo of an
etched iron meteorite with a large inclusion running through it (graphite surrounded by troilite?)

Just out of curiosity, anyone have a guess as to which iron it is? Maybe Gibeon?

http://www.sas.org/E-Bulletin/2004-04-02/features2/art/TonysmeteoriteDSCN5203.JPG





On Fri, 13 May 2005 23:03:41 -0400, Darren Garrison <cynapse_at_charter.net> wrote:

>Wow, I just found a direct link between the Kansas ID debate and meteorite collecting. In reading a
>transcript of arguments from the public in support of ID, A man named Tony Kostusik, who mentions
>being a meteorite collector, gave a brief (and from what I can tell, utterly incoherent and
>apparenlty disproving evolution because there are no square clouds) speech at the hearings.
>
>http://www.ksde.org/outcomes/schlagle.htm
>
>
>"MR. KOSTUSIK: Thank you for your time this evening. My name is Tony Kostusik, K-o-s-t-u-s-i-k,
>concerned Kansas citizen, grandfather of four. I have a lumber business, and I have been flying for
>40-some years, and I have taken -- I have taken many thousands of pictures. And the pictures that I
>brought here tonight with questions on the back, I think, are unanswered by evolution's answer. If
>that's the case, I think there needs to be an overhaul of what they -- I am not an educator, so
>excuse my language. I think they need to have an overhaul of what they consider scientific
>evidence. If the questions on the back are unanswered by Evolution, there has to be a change in
>Evolution. It can be partly there, but I think there has to be other alternatequestions brought up,
>as it just happened. I've never seen a square cloud in the scientific. I also collect meteorites.
>In a current book that I have, it's 222 times, maybe, it's also possible, could have come from,
>there are probably, and probably, it goes on and on. I've highlighted 72 different times. I think
>it's about time we get some what science matches what we actually see. So please consider that.
>Thank you for your time."
>
>And here's an article about the guy and meteorites:
>
>http://www.sas.org/E-Bulletin/2004-04-02/features2/body.html
>______________________________________________
>Meteorite-list mailing list
>Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
>http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Received on Sat 14 May 2005 01:13:39 PM PDT