[meteorite-list] Two Questions

From: Gerald Flaherty <grf2_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Tue May 24 18:42:18 2005
Message-ID: <004b01c560b1$cefa1160$2f01a8c0_at_Dell>

Hi Walter, Eric and List,
Would Martian Tectonic forces ie. subduction, be a possible mechanism to
trap and transport atmospheric gases into the bowels of the planet, later to
be be contained in a magma chamber?
Just an odd thought. Jerry
----- Original Message -----
From: <star-bits_at_comcast.net>
To: <meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 1:26 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Two Questions


> Walter Branch wrote:
>
> <I been researching but I can't find the answers to two questions.
>
> First, what is the mechanism by which atmospheric gasses
> are trapped in the formation of basalts? I have been doing some
> lit reviews on martian meteorites and I find it interesting that some
> were formed in magma chambers deep undergound. indeed, some are
> thought to have formed several kilometers down. How does the
> Martian atmosphere get trapped in cooling rock so far underground.>
>
> Hello Walter
>
> The mechanism for trapping gasses in Martian basalts is not entirely
> clear. One method that has been proven is implanting during shock events,
> such as being blasted off Mars. However there are some problems with this
> as well such as sometimes the gasses are fractionated (Kr/Xe ratio changes
> for instance). So although impact is likely part of the answer it isn't a
> clear winner. Another suggestion is fluid (water) transplant, however the
> gasses mostly reside in the water unaltered portions so this is likely not
> the answer. Trapping of mantle gasses during cooling has been suggested,
> but mantle reservoirs of gasses should have different ratios than
> atmospheric. So the exact mechanism is undetermined.
>
> <Second, when determining Cosmic Ray Exposure ages, can atmospheric
> fragmentation and ablation of a meteoroid affect the results from such
> testing and if so, how are fragmentation and ablation taken into
> consideration when determiniing CREs?>
>
> Yes fragmentation and ablation can affect the results and must be taken
> into account. Cosmic rays generally penetrate 3-10 meters into asteroidal
> bodies. Parts buried more than 10 meters or so receive almost no cosmic
> ray exposure so their CRE age is zero. If depth isn't taken into account
> a surface sample would show a older CRE than one at 5 meters. One method
> of determining depth is with Neon isotopes which have been shown to have a
> constant relationship with burial depth and cosmic ray exposure. So the
> neon can be used to determine depth and the other elemental isotopes can
> then be adusted for depth to give the CRE age.
>
>
> --
> Eric Olson
> ELKK Meteorites
> http://www.star-bits.com
>
>
>> Second try at posting this email:
>>
>> Hello Everyone,
>>
>> I been researching but I can't find the answers to two questions.
>>
>> First, what is the mechanism by which atmospheric gasses
>> are trapped in the formation of basalts? I have been doing some
>> lit reviews on martian meteorites and I find it interesting that some
>> were formed in magma chambers deep undergound. indeed, some are
>> thought to have formed several kilometers down. How does the
>> Martian atmosphere get trapped in cooling rock so far underground.
>>
>> Second, when determining Cosmic Ray Exposure ages, can atmospheric
>> fragmentation and ablation of a meteoroid affect the results from such
>> testing and if so, how are fragmentation and ablation taken into
>> consideration when determiniing CREs?
>>
>> Thanks to anyone who can help me understand these processes.
>>
>> -Walter Branch
>>
>>
>> ______________________________________________
>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>> Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
> ______________________________________________
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Received on Tue 24 May 2005 06:42:04 PM PDT