[meteorite-list] NWA 2736 - Aubrite or not??

From: stan . <laser_maniac_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Sat Feb 25 14:00:10 2006
Message-ID: <BAY101-F23B29D0765DB5C15E5CFC2F0F00_at_phx.gbl>

Anyone have a picture of this stuff?

>From: "Greg Hupe" <gmhupe_at_tampabay.rr.com>
>To: "Adam Hupe" <raremeteorites_at_comcast.net>
>CC: meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
>Subject: [meteorite-list] NWA 2736 - Aubrite or not??
>Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 13:50:11 -0500
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Received: from six.pairlist.net ([]) by
>bay0-mc10-f17.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Sat,
>25 Feb 2006 10:50:18 -0800
>Received: from six.pairlist.net (localhost [])by six.pairlist.net
>(Postfix) with ESMTPid 76D8E2C3FA; Sat, 25 Feb 2006 13:50:17 -0500 (EST)
>Received: from mu.pair.com (mu.pair.com [])by six.pairlist.net
>(Postfix) with SMTP id 9119F2C35Dfor
><meteorite-list_at_lists6.meteoritecentral.com>;Sat, 25 Feb 2006 13:50:15
>-0500 (EST)
>Received: (qmail 52099 invoked by uid 7111); 25 Feb 2006 18:50:15 -0000
>Received: (qmail 52096 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2006 18:50:15 -0000
>Received: from mailwash5.pair.com ( mu.pair.com with SMTP; 25
>Feb 2006 18:50:15 -0000
>Received: from localhost (localhost [])by mailwash5.pair.com
>(Postfix) with SMTP id D26D08D77Dfor
><meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com>;Sat, 25 Feb 2006 13:50:14 -0500 (EST)
>Received: from ms-smtp-04.tampabay.rr.com
>(ms-smtp-04-smtplb.tampabay.rr.com[])by mailwash5.pair.com
>(Postfix) with ESMTP id 32DAD8D779for
><meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com>;Sat, 25 Feb 2006 13:50:14 -0500 (EST)
>Received: from Gregor (dt062nae.tampabay.res.rr.com [])by
>ms-smtp-04.tampabay.rr.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP idk1PIoCNK029263; Sat,
>25 Feb 2006 13:50:12 -0500 (EST)
>X-Message-Info: oZ2qq1sZ3e7uKTlpeu1aTPKxe7cA08maElQ0LtnbiwQ=
>X-Original-To: meteorite-list_at_lists6.meteoritecentral.com
>Delivered-To: meteorite-list_at_six.pairlist.net
>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
>X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
>X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
>X-BeenThere: meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
>X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
>Precedence: list
>List-Id: Meteorite Discussion Forum <meteorite-list.meteoritecentral.com>
>List-Archive: <http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/meteorite-list>
>List-Post: <mailto:meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com>
>Errors-To: meteorite-list-bounces_at_meteoritecentral.com
>Return-Path: meteorite-list-bounces_at_meteoritecentral.com
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Feb 2006 18:50:18.0558 (UTC)
>To aubrite enthusiasts,
>Here is the link to a pdf report on NWA 2736:
>It states that, "..one or more relict chondrules in the sample." I thought
>that aubrites did not have any chondrules in them. Interesting. I've sent
>an email to a scientist asking his expert advice on aubrites. Hopefully I
>will have something to share when I get a reply.
>Best regards,
>----- Original Message ----- From: "Adam Hupe" <raremeteorites_at_comcast.net>
>To: <meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com>
>Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2006 1:32 PM
>Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] If I can choose.....!
>>Hi List,
>>After reading the papers on NWA 2736, which are now available online, it
>>sounds more like an EL6 than a true Aubrite to me. Why would the round
>>objects not be thought of as chondrules? To me, it is like trying to fit a
>>round peg into a square hole. I talked to a few scientists who would
>>the classification of Aubrite for NW 2736. It would be interesting to hear
>>others' thoughts on this. Is there a single sole out there that believes
>>NWA 2736 is really an Aubrite by definition?
>>My Thoughts,
>>----- Original Message ----- From: "Martin Altmann"
>>To: <MeteorHntr_at_aol.com>; <Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
>>Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2006 10:00 AM
>>Subject: AW: [meteorite-list] If I can choose.....!
>>I didn't get the question,
>>What Aubrites would be worth?
>>Most of them are available, look at the dealers pages.
>>I guess, cheapest should be Mt.Egerton, tataaah let's start discussion why
>>it's an AUB and not a mesosiderite.
>>Egerton should be obtainable at 15$/g in small pieces (at least I am
>>them at this price), with Egerton it's the same as with Tatahouine, the
>>larger the specimen, the higher the gram price.
>>No desert Aub?
>>What about Killgores NWA 2736 ?
>>Clueless Martin
>>-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>>Von: meteorite-list-bounces_at_meteoritecentral.com
>>[mailto:meteorite-list-bounces_at_meteoritecentral.com] Im Auftrag von
>>Gesendet: Samstag, 25. Februar 2006 18:33
>>An: gmhupe_at_tampabay.rr.com
>>Cc: meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
>>Betreff: Re: [meteorite-list] If I can choose.....!
>>In a message dated 2/24/2006 10:28:45 A.M. Central Standard Time,
>>gmhupe_at_tampabay.rr.com writes:
>>An aubrite would be a great choice I think since they are so rare. I am
>>curious to see what collectors would think they are worth per gram, known
>>falls, finds, any locality, including NWA (if a confirmed one were to be
>>I too am curious what Aubrites would be worth, especially Norton County,
>>that years of discovery in the hot deserts have yet to find a new one?
>>Obviously UNM has a big Norton County, but how much of that is actually
>>side of their main mass and in private collections?
>>Steve Arnold
>>Meteorite-list mailing list
>>Meteorite-list mailing list
>>Meteorite-list mailing list
>Meteorite-list mailing list
Received on Sat 25 Feb 2006 01:58:33 PM PST

Help support this free mailing list:

Yahoo MyWeb