[meteorite-list] Age of Man

From: cdtucson at cox.net <cdtucson_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 13:11:22 -0400
Message-ID: <20090619131122.CY76K.458292.imail_at_fed1rmwml33>

Chris, I am asking not telling but here is yet another example that is 360 million years old? How many odd examples does it take?
If two men say they are Jesus, one of them must be wrong. Right?
see link.

---- Chris Peterson <clp at alumni.caltech.edu> wrote:
> What the video is suggesting is rubbish. The likelihood of man being much
> older is very, very small. Dating artifacts is notoriously difficult; dating
> techniques for organic material are very sensitive to contamination, and
> geological dating is unreliable (artifacts can easily end up in unexpected
> strata). Dates are generally determined by looking at lots of examples, so
> that the statistical uncertainty can be reduced. Taking a very small number
> of outliers and basing your conclusions on them is generally poor science.
> What is it exactly that you are suggesting could be the case with
> meteoritics?
> Chris
> *****************************************
> Chris L Peterson
> Cloudbait Observatory
> http://www.cloudbait.com
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <cdtucson at cox.net>
> To: "meteoritelist" <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
> Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 10:12 AM
> Subject: [meteorite-list] Age of Man
> > List,
> > I have two questions about this very interesting video that may be a bit
> > off topic. The questions are ; Could this possibly be true and does this
> > sort of thing happen in meteoritic's. see link below.Thank's.
> > Carl Esparza
> ______________________________________________
> http://www.meteoritecentral.com
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Received on Fri 19 Jun 2009 01:11:22 PM PDT

Help support this free mailing list:

Yahoo MyWeb