[meteorite-list] Iridium measuring and testing- disgressionondowsing...

From: Michael Bross <element33_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 00:32:16 +0100
Message-ID: <052801c9a821$c67d7e30$166d8a5c_at_Inspiron8200>

Thanks Dave

You saw... I got a warm but also "hot" welcome :)
A bientot
Michael B, France


----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Gheesling" <dave at fallingrocks.com>
To: "'Michael Bross'" <element33 at peconic.net>; <cynapse at charter.net>;
<meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 1:02 AM
Subject: RE: [meteorite-list] Iridium measuring and testing-
disgressionondowsing...


> Welcome to the meteorite list, Michael... ;-)
> Dave
> www.fallingrocks.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com
> [mailto:meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com] On Behalf Of Michael
> Bross
> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 6:33 PM
> To: cynapse at charter.net; meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Iridium measuring and testing-
> disgressionondowsing...
>
> No
> I am talking about Yves Rocard, also father of Michel Rocard, Prime
> minister
> in France several years. Not a charlatan !
>
> I really don't like your mocking comments ! To say the least !
>
> I have been many years on a SERIOUS alchemical forum. Not talking about
> some
> stupid way to change lead into gold and other such legends stuck to
> alchemy,
> which I see as a proto chemistry... BUT regretting that modern chemistry
> has
> "forgotten"
> parts of what alchemy had searched, notably empiric knowledge etc... !
> The philosophical "stone"... well it is "just and only" philosophical,
> that's what real alchemy is about.
>
> I am considered as a serious "scientist"... certainly more than the famous
> anesthesiologist Dr. Reuben, who just showed the dark side of modern
> science:
> (http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/11/health/research/11pain.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq
> =Reuben&st=cse)
>
> If you think he is the only one... think twice :) And you have same in
> most
> other sciences, including agronomy and environmental studies that I know
> most !
>
> No, real alchemy was not any more the major science at Newton's time... !
> get informed.
> Go to the Vatican, which took all of the alchemical texts from the castle
> from Heidelberg after WW2... or to Scotland...
>
> Last but not least: if you had read my post in its entirety... you
> wouldn't
> talk like this, unless... ??!
>
> Enjoy your evening
>
> Michael B, France
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Darren Garrison" <cynapse at charter.net>
> To: <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 11:48 PM
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Iridium measuring and testing- disgression
> ondowsing...
>
>
> On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:21:25 +0100, you wrote:
>
>>Yves Rocard was simply saying that each and every human has an infinite
>>amount of magnetite ?
>>(can't remember) or something alike at both our wrists.
>>This amount varies greatly between individuals, resulting in better
>>capabilities for some to find water sources etc...
>>When using a rod, especially hazelnut, an arch is produced with an
>>intensity related to the amount or depth of the water.
>
> Ah, I see the source of the confusion here. You mean midiclorians, not
> magnetite. And Yoda, not Yves. Here's a quote from that paper:
>
> "Size matters not. Look at me. Judge me by my size, do you? Hmm? Hmm. And
> well you should not. For my ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is.
> Life creates it, makes it grow. Its energy surrounds us and binds us.
> Luminous beings are we, not this crude matter. You must feel the Force
> around you; here, between you, me, the tree, the rock, everywhere, yes.
> Even
> between the land and the ship."
>
>>
>>How many people know that Newton (and many other famous scientists) did
>>serious alchemical studies and writings in "secrecy", to not tarnish
>>their reputation... ?
>
> Very few people know that, given the fact that alchemy WAS the mainstream
> science at the time-- there was nothing to hide. Given the scientific
> knowledge at the time, searching for the philosopher's stone was no less
> reasonable or credible a scientific pursuit than any other (but which, in
> the end, turned out to be based on an inaccurate model of the basis of
> matter.) Chemestry as we know it hadn't been invented yet. Modern
> chemestry is what is left of alchemy after many ideas in alchemy have been
> disproven (and some proven).
> ______________________________________________
> http://www.meteoritecentral.com
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________
> http://www.meteoritecentral.com
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
>
Received on Wed 18 Mar 2009 07:32:16 PM PDT