[meteorite-list] Gebel Kemil article in New Scientist

From: David Norton <renov8hotels_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 12:49:47 -0700
Message-ID: <000001cb34d7$5c16eb50$1444c1f0$_at_net>

Am I mistaken or is the location in a region of disputed boundaries? If so,
the rightful owner has yet to be determined. Additionally, I believe that I
had previously read that Egypt does not have laws specifically regarding
meteorites, but has strong laws regarding "artifacts".

-----Original Message-----
From: meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com
[mailto:meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com] On Behalf Of Matt Smith
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 11:40 AM
To: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
Subject: [meteorite-list] Gebel Kemil article in New Scientist

An article on the controversy regarding the recent Gebel Kemil find:

http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20727724.000-deep-impact-market-the-ra
ce-to-acquire-meteorites.html

or

http://bit.ly/ct9U42

Regarding the legal situation it states:

"In Egypt, permission is supposed to be required to export meteorites. Di
Martino and colleagues were authorised to take just 20 kilograms of Gebel
Kamil
out of the country. "Everything which is found in the Egyptian soil is
property
of the government," explains Tarek Hussein, who as former president of
Egypt's
Academy of Scientific Research and Technology was responsible for handling
export applications until last April. He is concerned that many Gebel Kamil
fragments that have appeared on the market in the west were not approved for

export."


Matt.


______________________________________________
Visit the Archives at
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Received on Thu 05 Aug 2010 03:49:47 PM PDT