[meteorite-list] Pojoaque Pallisite

From: MexicoDoug <mexicodoug_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 17:50:58 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <8CEF5327626EFE2-990-475FD_at_webmail-d001.sysops.aol.com>

I'll look for a picture of it, but it is likely not in my present
location. I believe I posted a picture to the meteorite list though it
has surely been at least five years. The trophy-piece it is no longer
with the finder as of about 10 years ago. It is hazy in memory though
I documented it extremely well photographically as it seemed like a
priceless anecdote. But the memory is coming back a bit as I mull it
over. I believe it was motor oil to be more specific .... used motor
oil! It is hard to describe in a written form the invisible force that
made him do this, but if fetish isn't the right word, which I think it
is, a strong hankering or light obsession to annoint it because he
perceived it required that, perhaps for its upkeep ... I didn't try to
reason after I realized this was in the realm of beliefs, developed in
an isolated case ... my Galapagos story of meteorite evolution in this
miraculous world ... rather than shed tears for the stne itself, better
to contemplate the meaning of this ;-)

Kindest wishes
Doug


-----Original Message-----
From: Regine P. <fips_bruno at yahoo.de>
To: MexicoDoug <mexicodoug at aim.com>; Meteorite-list
<Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
Sent: Mon, Apr 30, 2012 5:12 pm
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Pojoaque Pallisite



What happened to the oily Allende trophy? He's not keeping it on his
desk anymore?







------------------------------------------------------------
  Von: MexicoDoug <mexicodoug at aim.com>
 An: fips_bruno at yahoo.de; Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
 Gesendet: 22:44 Montag, 30.April 2012
 Betreff: Re: [meteorite-list] Pojoaque Pallisite


"the handling by many [Canyon Diablo (Camp Verde)]"

Conjectures of course on everyone' part, peppered by our own biases or
cultural assumptions (Would Native Americans even have the concept of
private property vs. community property for such a large relic?), which
is what makes it a great subject for a round table discussion ...
whether meteorites or not, look at Kaaba's Black Stone or Ensisheim as
possibilities, here - from wikipedia, on the Kaaba Black Stone:

"Its physical appearance is that of a fragmented dark rock, polished
smooth by the hands of millions of pilgrims. Islamic tradition holds
that it fell from Heaven to show Adam and Eve where to build an
altar..."

One guy I know who picked up an Allende stone in 1969 had a strange
belief and venerated his find in his own way, all by himself, over the
years.? He somehow discovered his pristine stone would readily absorb
(can't remember if it was water or oil, but I think oil), and he
annointed it regularly with some strange fettish idea of that being
good for it; nothing too serious but he believed it enough to do it
regularly for decades.? He kept it trophy-mounted on a wooden base on
his desk for many years.? If not for a witness, and had it been taken
out of context, I wonder how the best meteoriticist might get the stone
to talk (interpret the result)?

That's an excellent image of the profile of the Camp Verde iron -
thanks for the followup ;-)

Kindest wishes
Doug


-----Original Message-----
From: Regine P. <fips_bruno at yahoo.de>
To: MexicoDoug <mexicodoug at aim.com>; Meteorite-list
<Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
Sent: Mon, Apr 30, 2012 1:17 pm
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Pojoaque Pallisite


Other images are here:

http://spiralmemo.blogspot.de/p/blog-page.html

and here:

http://spiralmemo.blogspot.de/p/night-at-museum.html


Interesting, the handling by many somehow never occurred to me. I
always
imagined just one person treating the meteorite as one of his own kids.
Perhaps
because it was wrapped in a feather blanket and had its own grave.



----- Urspr?ngliche Message -----
> Von: MexicoDoug <mexicodoug at aim.com>
> An: fips_bruno at yahoo.de; Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> CC:
> Gesendet: 16:22 Montag, 30.April 2012
> Betreff: Re: [meteorite-list] Pojoaque Pallisite
>
> Interesting though these are likely three different types of human
> weathering (wearing).
>
> w1: Here's a nice picture of the Canyon Diablo (Camp Verde iron)
piece
> in which listmembers can appreciate these comments regarding possible
> handling (rubbing, perhaps along these line suggested something
similar
> to a tradition of receiving sacrament (Eucharist (sp?)) some Mexican
> Catholic churches when a transmuted plaster-Jesus is kissed by nearly
> everyone attending lined up single file - causing wear).
>
> http://books.google.com/books?id=xCGpmoJl2dgC&pg=PA118
>
> w2: The perceptions of "wear " on an ancient, recovered find are of a
> different nature than one with fresh fusion crust and flowlines plus,
> over the stony olivine crystals of the Glorieta Mountain (Pojoaque
> iron) piece what was claimed to be a thick, possible fresh fusion
> crust.? But as you say they could show different sorts of handling,
in
> a case of a 61 kilos Camp Verde, not likely to have been carried
about!
>
>
> w3: As for Anoka (Havana beads), as well as the Egyptian stuff,
that's
> a different type of forming and "wearing" than Pojoaque and Camp
Verde
>
> - the work in the literature and a poster on the Smithsonian website
a
> few years ago pairing some of those to the Anoka meteorite suggests
> that the Smithsonian/UCLA/Iowa has access to two of the mentioned
beads.
>
> "We conducted optical microscopy, SEM ele-mental and phase mapping,
> electron microprobe analy-ses, LA-ICP-MS and INAA analyses of Havana
> and Anoka for comparison."
>
> ref:
> http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2008/pdf/1984.pdf
>
>
> kindest wishes
> Doug
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Regine P. <fips_bruno at yahoo.de>
> To: MexicoDoug <mexicodoug at aim.com>; Meteorite-list
> <Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
> Sent: Mon, Apr 30, 2012 2:00 am
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Pojoaque Pallisite
>
>
> Camp Verde comes to mind, of which one side, "the backbone" as
> Laurence
> Garvie
> calls it, seems to have been rubbed smooth. But taken its weight it
> could hardly
> have been carried around by a medicine man. Since I have first seen
it
> I have
> always imagined someone taking it for its deceased child which has
> fallen back
> from the sky. It has a head, shoulders and a spine. Just a trifle
heavy
> perhaps.
>
>
>
> ----- Urspr?ngliche Message -----
>>? Von: MexicoDoug <mexicodoug at aim.com>
>>? An: fips_bruno at yahoo.de; Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>>? CC:
>>? Gesendet: 1:57 Montag, 30.April 2012
>>? Betreff: Re: [meteorite-list] Pojoaque Pallisite
>>
>> & quot; the meteorite had been carried in a medicine bag? It doesn't
>
> sound
>>? implausible, but what are the clues?"
>>
>>? Hi, Regine, Carleton, Mike, Bernd, Jeff, David, Listers;
>>
>>? I would like to draw some attention to the "carried in a medicine
>>? pouch" since Regine asked ;-)
>>
>>? These guys are all with the Great Spirit now, who did the
> excavations, so
>>? we're stuck analyzing something that was contermplated in the
> 1920's
>>? with the baggage of nearly an intervening century.
>>
>>? It is quite possible, like many things, that this medicine pouch
> comment is a
>>? comment run amok as usual with meteorites, someone says something,
> then it
> takes
>>? on a life of its own due to tales getting taller,even among
> conservative
>>? scientists, unintentionally, of course, everyone just takes away a
> different
>>? idea and they follow natural 'election'.
>>
>>? The original comment seems to be that it was carried as
> "medicine",
>>? rather than in a medicine pouch.? While this seems to be a minor
> difference,
>>? it's not.? One involves an inference and the other is more of an
>>? observation.
>>
>>? Nininger later (1952) expounds on the comment when discussing
Native
> American
>>? meteorite collectors and the medicine pounch has by then become
alive
> in its
>>? own, through no one's fault.
>>
>>? The concept of "medicine" doesn't necessarily require a
> pouch, and
>>? may not even be in the hands of a medicine man, why, it just as
well
> could
> have
>>? been a chief, or a brave warrior ... and could just as well be from
a
> great
> deal
>>? of handling.? The observation was simply that at least three of the
>>? protuberances above the regmaglypts depressions were highly worn
from
> what was
>
>>? very plausibly a soft material.? To make the leap to call it a
pouch,
> or just
> a
>>? lot of hands ... is a good philosophical theme for a room full of
> meteorite
>>? collectors and archeaologists without Regine's magic powder burns
> evidence.?
>>? But the fact was, the wear was supposedly caused from a lot of
> handling or
>>? rubbing.? That said, ablation is a strange master and it would be
> verrrrry
>>? interesting to revisit this "wear" which formed the basis of the
>>? original archaeological comments.
>>
>>? What is for sure, apparently is that it was found inside the
pottery
> and that
> in
>>? turn in a burial ground.? So there are some Spirits floating around
> it.?
> Perhaps
>>? Man & Impact Ed has a theory, it's his ballywick.? But we do need
> to
> see
>>? it.? Carleton kindly mentions that a couple of grams were at ASU,
> that makes
>>? sense that Nininger would take some.? My fear is that calling this
> pivotal
> iron
>>? "just" another synonym does no good to science if it is lost for
>>? inspection.? Apparently the piece weighed originally 3 ounces
(about
> 85 g),
> and
>>? it was a complete individual subject to what was speculated to be a
> violent
>>? history, that is, after Nininger figured out how Glorieta ripped
> apart along
> of
>>? course with Kunz.
>>
>>? But not only is the mystery with the original piece, this piece is
> historical
> in
>>? that it was the first specimen that was used as a keystone to pair
a
> pallasite
>
>>? fall to a siderite fall ... and help create the need to have a
single
> name
> with
>>? synonyms ... how ironic, errr... palladoxical ;-)
>>
>>? Kindest wishes
>>? Doug
>>
>>
>>
>>? -----Original Message-----
>>? From: Regine P. <fips_bruno at yahoo.de>
>>? To: MexicoDoug <mexicodoug at aim.com>; bernd.pauli
>>? <bernd.pauli at paulinet.de>; meteorite-list
>>? <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
>>? Sent: Sun, Apr 29, 2012 7:04 pm
>>? Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Pojoaque Pallisite
>>
>>
>>? Hi Doug, Bernd and all,
>>
>>? I too would like to know where this one is being kept. What baffles
> me though,
>>? how does one get to the conclusion the meteorite had been carried
in
> a
> medicine
>>? bag? It doesn't sound implausible, but what are the clues? Magic
> powder
>>? topping?
>>? Is there any further info?
>>
>>
>>? Regine
>>
>>
>>
>>? ----- Urspr?ngliche Message -----
>>> ? Von: MexicoDoug <mexicodoug at aim.com>
>>> ? An: bernd.pauli at paulinet.de; meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>>> ? CC:
>>> ? Gesendet: 23:54 Sonntag, 29.April 2012
>>> ? Betreff: Re: [meteorite-list] Pojoaque Pallisite
>>>
>>> ? Hi Listers,
>>>
>>> ? Paired - quite likely - It has a much more interesting history
than
>>? to be
>>? lumped
>>> ? as a synonym and IMO value as a named iron in its own right:
>>>
>>> ? This particular iron showed a lot of evidence of wear from human
>>? handling and
>>> ? Nininger supported Mera's suggestion that it was carried in a
>>? medicine pouch
>>> ? in Pojoaque, which makes a triangle geographically, roughly, with
>>? Santa Fe,
>>> ? Glorieta, Mountain locality and Pojoaque pueble.? According to the
>>? circumstances
>>> ? of the fine, it was found inside some old pottery during
> excavations
>>? at the
>>> ? Pueblo, i.e., protected, and exhibited beautiful flow lines and
>>? notable bluish
>>
>>> ? fresh fusion crust, indicating it was a reasonable possibility
that
>>? whoever
>>> ? found it saw it fall.? As it was found during excavations, it
> raises
>>? the
>>> ? possibility of using this to date the Glorieta Mountain fall.
>>>
>>> ? It would be nice to know where this meteorite is now.? Did it
make
> it
>>? to New
>>> ? Mexico's collection?? Nininger, in 1931, saw it in Santa Fe,
>>? specifically in
>>> ? the "Department of Anthropology", where Mera may have been
>>? working.?
>>> ? But someone else needs to sleuth a bit further from here because I
>>? sure
>>> ? don't know where it is now, and it would be great to see it in its
>>? present
>>> ? condition ;-), as it was cut up a bit because Nininger and others
>>? used it to
>>> ? argue that Glorieta Mountain wasn't a siderite, but a
>>? sidero-pallasite
>>> ? combination as well as consolidate some of the names Bernd lists
> ...
>>? I think
>>? the
>>> ? paper was 1940.
>>>
>>> ? Definitely a specimen with a very special, if not sacred, history
> ...
>>>
>>> ? Kindest wishes
>>> ? Doug
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ? -----Original Message-----
>>> ? From: Bernd V. Pauli <bernd.pauli at paulinet.de>
>>> ? To: meteorite-list <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
>>> ? Sent: Sun, Apr 29, 2012 5:03 pm
>>> ? Subject: [meteorite-list] Pojoaque Pallisite
>>>
>>>
>>> ? Hello Jeff, Mike, David and List,
>>>
>>> ? David wrote: "It is indeed the synonym for Glorieta"
>>>
>>> ? ... and only one out of several others:
>>>
>>> ? Albuquerque
>>> ? Canoncito
>>> ? Glorieta
>>> ? Pojoaque
>>> ? Rio Arriba
>>> ? Santa Fe
>>> ? Santa Fe County
>>> ? Trinity County
>>>
>>> ? Cheers,
>>>
>>> ? Bernd
>>>
>>>
>>> ? ______________________________________________
>>>
>>> ? Visit the Archives at
>>? http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
>>> ? Meteorite-list mailing list
>>> ? Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>>> ? http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>>>
>>> ? ______________________________________________
>>>
>>> ? Visit the Archives at
>>? http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
>>> ? Meteorite-list mailing list
>>> ? Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
>>> ? http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>>>
>>
>

?






  
Received on Mon 30 Apr 2012 05:50:58 PM PDT