[meteorite-list] Chelyabinsk is not a impact-melt?

From: Anne Black <impactika_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 01:13:42 -0500
Message-ID: <14bb511dfb7-5602-36800_at_webprd-m37.mail.aol.com>

Frankly,
If Chelyabinsk is not an impact-melt then frankly I don't know what is!
Look for yourselves: http://www.impactika.com/chely-slice.jpg
And dozens of other pictures right on the Met. Database.
And the classification was done by the Vernadsky Institute.


Anne M. Black
www.IMPACTIKA.com
IMPACTIKA at aol.com


-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Farmer via Meteorite-list <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
To: <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com> <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
Sent: Sun, Feb 22, 2015 9:38 pm
Subject: [meteorite-list] Chelyabinsk is not a impact-melt?


Steve and Quinn Arnold are telling us on Facebook that Chelyabinsk is not an impact-melt breccia, and that Tony Irving confirms that. Is that true? Funny when I google it, hundreds of papers discuss the metric ton of known Chelyabinsk as all being impact-melt material. Of course, those of us who went there and have a large amount of Chelyabinsk can tell you that it sure seem full of clasts, and melt pockets and shock veins. Since his kickstarter rock seems to be the only known LL5 melt (according to the (met. Bull.)and Chelyabinsk seems to be nothing of the sort, it is amazing to me.
Comments? Anyone in this list, scientist or collector know something I don't, that Chelyabinsk is a "non" impact-melt meteorite?
Micael Farmer




Sent from my iPad
______________________________________________

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist3.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

 
Received on Mon 23 Feb 2015 01:13:42 AM PST