[meteorite-list] Peer review as the ‘gold standard’ ?

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

From: Paul <etchplain_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2019 17:39:41 -0500
Message-ID: <ef28dcab-444f-2929-23fa-c8cdcccde405_at_att.net>

Why we shouldn???t take peer review as the ???gold standard???
It???s too easy for bad actors to exploit the process and mislead the public
By Paul D. Thacker and Jon Tennant, Washington Post, August 1, 2019
https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/why-we-shouldnt-take-peer-review-as-the-gold-standard/2019/08/01/fd90749a-b229-11e9-8949-5f36ff92706e_story.html

The Radical Transformation of the Textbook
Brian Barrett, Wired, august 4, 2019
https://www.wired.com/story/digital-textbooks-radical-transformation/

Yours,

Paul H.
Received on Mon 05 Aug 2019 06:39:41 PM PDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Dolores Hill: "[meteorite-list] OSIRIS-REx Bennu Mappers still needs you!"
Previous message: Paul: "[meteorite-list] Martian Meteor Collision May Have Triggered a 1, 000-Foot Tsunami"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]