[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Subscription to the meteorite list
I thought there was enough maturity here to let bygones be bygones. Apparently I
was incorrect. Julia (and everyone ELSE involved in that thread) have long since
apoligized, and everyone ELSE seemed o.k. with that. Geez ... now you're
resorting to THIS? Seems like, since this is no longer an issue, any continuance
of the re-hashing is REALLY off-target ... and irrelevant!
Peri Craig
J. Warren wrote:
> Julia wrote:
>
> >Now the list has made it's wishes clearly known. There are children who
> >want to learn about meteorites on the internet. Please do not keep
> >repeating this as you are the offender now.
>
> WOW! There are children who want to learn about meteorites on the internet
> now?? I'm sure glad there weren't any when you were discussing your PENIS
> SHAPED TETKITE AND METEORITE RANCH. But since there are NOW children on the
> internet who want to learn about meteorites.....i must, as Bill Clinton
> would say, refrain from discussing JULIA'S past subject of meteorite
> sex......... For the Children.
>
> Joel
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jjswaim <MissionControl@email.msn.com>
> To: meteorite-list <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
> Date: Sunday, June 20, 1999 12:30 PM
> Subject: Re: Subscription to the meteorite list
>
> >It was a Glorieta.
> >
> >Now the list has made it's wishes clearly known. There are children who
> >want to learn about meteorites on the internet. Please do not keep
> >repeating this as you are the offender now.
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: J. Warren <warr@arn.net>
> >To: jjswaim <MissionControl@email.msn.com>; meteorite-list
> ><meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>; Phil Bagnall
> ><phil@ticetboo.demon.co.uk>
> >Date: Sunday, June 20, 1999 1:01 PM
> >Subject: Re: Subscription to the meteorite list
> >
> >
> >|Julia,
> >| Boy, some of the words and phrases you using in this thread are as big
> >|as that PENIS SHAPED TEKTITE ON THAT METEORITE RANCH that you use to
> >|discuss!!!!
> >|
> >|
> >|Joel :)
> >|
> >|P.S. Happy to fathers day to all that it applies to!!!!!
> >|
> >|
> >|-----Original Message-----
> >|From: jjswaim <MissionControl@email.msn.com>
> >|To: meteorite-list <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>; Phil Bagnall
> >|<phil@ticetboo.demon.co.uk>
> >|Date: Sunday, June 20, 1999 11:29 AM
> >|Subject: Re: Subscription to the meteorite list
> >|
> >|
> >|>
> >|>jjswaim wrote:
> >|>|
> >|>|> and these
> >|>|>boundaries are flimsy and easily penetrable for discussion. I'd still
> >|>like
> >|>|>to see a wider range of multidisiplinary discussions, but I'm not going
> >|to
> >|>|>push it. At least we can now include astrophysics , astrobiology,
> solar
> >|>|>system formation, etc. which used to be a no-no.
> >|>|
> >|>|Phil Bagnall wrote:
> >|>
> >|>|One the one hand you seem to be saying that we have a set of rules that
> >we
> >|>|should all stick to and ban anyone who does not, and yet on the other
> >hand
> >|>|you are saying that we should bend the rules if and when we feel like
> it.
> >|>|Come on Julia, you can't have it both ways!
> >|>|
> >|>Yes I can:-) Very little is mutually exclusive and I'm surprised I
> wasn't
> >|>challenged on that a while ago on one of my postings. But that's another
> >|>subject.
> >|>
> >|>My above statement was in response to your question, "Where do we draw
> the
> >|>line?" You were saying that no line should be drawn and I was telling
> >you
> >|>where I draw it. This, however, does not mean that the list has to draw
> >it
> >|>the same place I do. In fact, as I pointed out, I pushed the line as
> far
> >|>as I thought reasonable, worthwhile, and beneficial in the name of
> >science.
> >|>(Yes, as a human being I love to joke around as well and certainly found
> >|the
> >|>boundary of subject matter to joke about:-)
> >|>
> >|>The dynamics of this list are ever changing as are scientific discoveries
> >|>and theories. It therefore behooves us to continually reevaluate both
> the
> >|>rules of the list and our individual thinking on these scientific
> matters.
> >|>I am hoping common sense will prevail and that it is indeed possible to
> >|have
> >|>boundaries so that this precious list does not become commonplace. There
> >|>are so many others that are. I say protect what we have judiciously.
> >|>
> >|>Best regards,
> >|>Julia
> >|>|
> >|>|
> >|>|
> >|>
> >|>
> >|>
> >|>|
> >|>
> >|>
> >|>
> >|>
> >|>
> >|>----------
> >|>Archives located at:
> >|>http://www.meteoritecentral.com/list_best.html
> >|>
> >|>For help, FAQ's and sub. info. visit:
> >|>http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing_list.html
> >|>----------
> >|>
> >|>
> >|
> >
> >
> >
> >----------
> >Archives located at:
> >http://www.meteoritecentral.com/list_best.html
> >
> >For help, FAQ's and sub. info. visit:
> >http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing_list.html
> >----------
> >
> >
>
> ----------
> Archives located at:
> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/list_best.html
>
> For help, FAQ's and sub. info. visit:
> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing_list.html
> ----------
----------
Archives located at:
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/list_best.html
For help, FAQ's and sub. info. visit:
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing_list.html
----------
References: