[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: MCO



Well ... there IS a new, virtually ready technology that would provide the
ability for manned flight to Mars from concept to implementation in 6 months
flat ... that's the advantage of free enterprize. The technology is almost
completed, and the program that would put man on Mars would cost  less than
1/10th the operating budget of NASA.  The company's one investor (a private
investor) had to pull out because of some financial difficulties. Less than 1
million dollars operating budget would get this DONE.
I happen to know this FOR A FACT. I also know the engineers, and that they're
perfectly happy to sit down and talk physics with anyone interested in funding
all or part. Rather than bemoan the tax losses, why not go with volitional
private enterprize?
P. Craig

Meteordealer@aol.com wrote:

> In a message dated 9/25/99 1:06:20 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> WBranchsb@aol.com writes:
>
> << Out of around 20 missions to Mars about a dozen have been failures.  >>
>
> Those are my tax dollars hard at work. Or should i say, those are my tax
> dollars up in smoke! :-)
>
> ----------
> Archives located at:
> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/list_best.html
>
> For help, FAQ's and sub. info. visit:
> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing_list.html
> ----------

----------
Archives located at:
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/list_best.html

For help, FAQ's and sub. info. visit:
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing_list.html
----------


References: