[meteorite-list] Re: Adam's bullshit re nwa 904

From: Adam Hupe <raremeteorites_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Wed Nov 24 15:29:55 2004
Message-ID: <01ab01c4d262$e0d06c00$6401a8c0_at_c1720188a>

Stan, the image you took proves absolutely nothing because we don't know
what the other meteorite is that it is being compared to. If it has a label
stating it is NWA 904 then it is NWA 904. One reason is that you can not
say for sure the other stone is NWA 869 because it has never been
classified. I have seen CCs pulled from batches of NWA 869 so everything is
getting mixed in. Look at the crust on the NWA 904 piece and compare it to
the so-called NWA 869, see the differences. NWA 904 was submitted to UCLA
close to the same time as NWA 869. Can you tell everybody why NWA 904 is
official and NWA 869 is not. Could it be that they are different? Read the
archives, this issue has come up before. NWA 904 was first called a
collection in a slice by a well-known and respected List member who pointed
out the differences on his web-site.


.
----- Original Message -----
From: "stan ." <laser_maniac_at_hotmail.com>
To: <raremeteorites_at_comcast.net>
Cc: <meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 12:03 PM
Subject: Adam's bullshit re nwa 904


> here ya go adam- granted the scale shows a discrepancy of 2g - but i
> repolished the slice on my own. I bought it from you guys off of ebay - if
i
> gave a shit about your attorney i could look back through my email
archives
> and tell you what ebay auction number it was.
>
> http://img94.exs.cx/img94/8020/nwa904.jpg
>
> are you telling me that the stone you sold me was not nwa 904? should i be
> making fraud charges against YOU????
>
> I'm waiting for an IMMEDIATE explaination here.
>
> stan
>
>
>
> >From: "Adam Hupe" <raremeteorites_at_comcast.net>
> >To: "stan ." <laser_maniac_at_hotmail.com>
> >Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] NWA904 Meteorite, Collection in a
Slice,MAIN
> >MASS 1, 968g
> >Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 02:04:54 -0800
> >
> >Why do you post such BS?, the images you share are false, Expect to hear
> >form my attorney!
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "stan ." <laser_maniac_at_hotmail.com>
> >To: <marcin_at_meteoryt.net>; <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
> >Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 10:37 PM
> >Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] NWA904 Meteorite, Collection in a
Slice,MAIN
> >MASS 1, 968g
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > > > Sorta looks like NWA869 to me.
> > > >
> > > >far from this Dean. Maybe this is not that big different from NWA869
as
> >my
> > > >NWA1906 from Mike NWA1906 :-D but this is for sure not the same
> >meteorite.
> > >
> > > http://img106.exs.cx/img106/764/869and904.jpg
> > > one of the slices in that photo is a piece of 904 from the hupes, the
> >other
> > > is a piece of 869 from dean. both great hunks of meteorite... wanna
> >guess
> > > what one is what?
> > >
> > >
> > > ______________________________________________
> > > Meteorite-list mailing list
> > > Meteorite-list_at_meteoritecentral.com
> > > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
> >
> >
>
>
Received on Wed 24 Nov 2004 03:14:14 PM PST