[meteorite-list] NWA 5363 UNGROUPED OR BRACHNITE

From: Barry Hughes <bhughes_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2010 22:26:18 -0400
Message-ID: <AANLkTik30j5epi5_J2Lt4M=P+EiUTRZpVr-2fub5HvFm_at_mail.gmail.com>

I'm a new person...I'm talking meteorites...nothing else. I see a
fight for money here. It's obvious to the people who are interested
in meteorites for the reason people should be...they are wonderful to
look at, learn about, and own..remember? The people about to make a
lot of money..or not..don't paint a pretty picture here...
Is this what the list is about?

On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 9:34 PM, <cdtucson at cox.net> wrote:
> Anne,
> I hate to beat a dead horse ......
> All due respect here but, am I missing something ?
> Yes, Dr. Irving is one of our most brilliant Scientist's we all know that but, he is not the only one. I repeat. Dr. jambon says it' so. So it's so.
> Sorry.
> Solong.
> Carl
>
> --
> Carl or Debbie Esparza
> Meteoritemax
>
>
> ---- Impactika at aol.com wrote:
>> Carl,
>>
>> Yes, I read your email.
>>
>> Look at the Met. Bulletin, NWA 5363 is still listed as provosional
>> I am sorry but you will have to wait for Dr. Irving to publish the results
>> of the O-Isotopes comparison.
>>
>> Anne M. Black
>> _http://www.impactika.com/_ (http://www.impactika.com/)
>> _IMPACTIKA at aol.com_ (mailto:IMPACTIKA at aol.com)
>> Vice-President, I.M.C.A. Inc.
>> _http://www.imca.cc/_ (http://www.imca.cc/)
>>
>>
>> In a message dated 7/24/2010 6:55:39 PM Mountain Daylight Time,
>> cdtucson at cox.net writes:
>> Anne,
>> Perhaps you did not read my last post ?(same thread) because I posted an
>> email in it's entirety from Dr. Jambon. Evidently, The corrections to his
>> original classification have been made and
>> In his email he clearly states ? "NWA 5400 is undoubtedly paired with NWA
>> 5363!".
>> This leaves NO room for doubt. It is paired and the time for patience has
>> past.
>> We now know the whole story. He goes on to say that the Nom. Com and
>> Science publications. already have this information.
>> Thank you Dr. Jambon for this great news.
>> Carl
>> --
>> Carl or Debbie Esparza
>> Meteoritemax
>>
>>
>> ---- Impactika at aol.com wrote:
>> > Kai,
>> >
>> > This was discussed at length only 6 weeks ago. Let's not do that again.
>> >
>> > The only way it will be known for certain whether those two meteorites
>> are
>> > paired, or not, will be after a comparative study of the Oxygen Isotopes
>> is
>> > done on both meteorites.
>> > It has been done by Dr. Tony Irving for NWA 5400.
>> > He has now been supplied with a fragment of NWA 5363.
>> > And we will have to wait until he is done studying this second one.
>> >
>> > Patiently if at all possible!
>> >
>> > Anne M. Black
>> > _http://www.impactika.com/_ (http://www.impactika.com/)
>> > _IMPACTIKA at aol.com_ (mailto:IMPACTIKA at aol.com)
>> > Vice-President, I.M.C.A. Inc.
>> > _http://www.imca.cc/_ (http://www.imca.cc/)
>> >
>> >
>> > In a message dated 7/24/2010 4:19:47 PM Mountain Daylight Time,
>> > torontokai at gmail.com writes:
>> > Hi Tom,
>> >
>> > I am confused by your post. You memtioned that 5363 is 5400 paired.
>> > But NWA5400 is a brachnite like but not a brachnite due to its
>> > terrestial osotope. It is a terrestial meteorite or ungrouped. To be a
>> > brachnite and nwa5400 paired is a contradiction to me. Anyway I cannot
>> > find the ?5363 on meteotitical bulletin.
>> >
>> > Just post my thinking for your consideration.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Kai
>>
>
> ______________________________________________
> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
Received on Sat 24 Jul 2010 10:26:18 PM PDT