[meteorite-list] NWA 5363 UNGROUPED OR BRACHNITE

From: cdtucson at cox.net <cdtucson_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2010 21:34:45 -0400
Message-ID: <20100724213445.WW93D.162674.imail_at_fed1rmwml33>

Anne,
I hate to beat a dead horse ......
All due respect here but, am I missing something ?
Yes, Dr. Irving is one of our most brilliant Scientist's we all know that but, he is not the only one. I repeat. Dr. jambon says it' so. So it's so.
Sorry.
Solong.
Carl

--
Carl or Debbie Esparza
Meteoritemax
---- Impactika at aol.com wrote: 
> Carl,
>  
> Yes, I read your email.
>  
> Look at the Met. Bulletin, NWA 5363 is still listed as provosional
> I am sorry but you will have to wait for Dr. Irving to publish the results 
> of the O-Isotopes comparison.
>  
> Anne M. Black
> _http://www.impactika.com/_ (http://www.impactika.com/) 
> _IMPACTIKA at aol.com_ (mailto:IMPACTIKA at aol.com) 
> Vice-President, I.M.C.A. Inc.
> _http://www.imca.cc/_ (http://www.imca.cc/) 
>  
>  
> In a message dated 7/24/2010 6:55:39 PM Mountain Daylight Time, 
> cdtucson at cox.net writes:
> Anne,
> Perhaps you did not read my last post  (same thread) because I posted an 
> email in it's entirety from Dr. Jambon. Evidently, The corrections to his 
> original classification have been made and 
> In his email he clearly states   "NWA 5400 is undoubtedly paired with NWA 
> 5363!".
> This leaves NO room for doubt. It is paired and the time for patience has  
> past. 
> We now know the whole story. He goes on to say that the Nom. Com and 
> Science publications. already have this information. 
> Thank you Dr. Jambon for this great news.
> Carl
> --
> Carl or Debbie Esparza
> Meteoritemax
> 
> 
> ---- Impactika at aol.com wrote: 
> > Kai, 
> >  
> > This was discussed at length only 6 weeks ago. Let's not do that again.
> >  
> > The only way it will be known for certain whether those two meteorites 
> are 
> > paired, or not, will be after a comparative study of the Oxygen Isotopes 
> is 
> > done on both meteorites.
> > It has been done by Dr. Tony Irving for NWA 5400.
> > He has now been supplied with a fragment of NWA 5363.
> > And we will have to wait until he is done studying this second one.
> >  
> > Patiently if at all possible!
> >  
> > Anne M. Black
> > _http://www.impactika.com/_ (http://www.impactika.com/) 
> > _IMPACTIKA at aol.com_ (mailto:IMPACTIKA at aol.com) 
> > Vice-President, I.M.C.A. Inc.
> > _http://www.imca.cc/_ (http://www.imca.cc/) 
> >  
> >  
> > In a message dated 7/24/2010 4:19:47 PM Mountain Daylight Time, 
> > torontokai at gmail.com writes:
> > Hi Tom,
> > 
> > I am confused by your post. You memtioned that 5363 is 5400 paired.
> > But NWA5400 is a brachnite like but not a brachnite due to its
> > terrestial osotope. It is a terrestial meteorite or ungrouped. To be a
> > brachnite and nwa5400 paired is a contradiction to me. Anyway I cannot
> > find the  5363 on meteotitical bulletin.
> > 
> > Just post my thinking for your consideration.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Kai
> 

Received on Sat 24 Jul 2010 09:34:45 PM PDT