[meteorite-list] Bigfoot and the "Nakhla Dog" - what do they havein common?

From: Becky and Kirk <bandk_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 18:46:39 -0500
Message-ID: <E076144A7B1A4DAFB62F99E64BD02C9D_at_owner55652f88b>

I indeed have heard stories about Semi-drivers who HAVE occasionally hit a
Sasquatch in the Pacific Northwest.

The one particular tale I heard 2nd-hand was from man who talked to a driver
who said he hit & killed one in Colorado many years ago. He said he was
detained for a bit by a special group of police, while another group cleaned
his truck of all evidence of his "fatal encounter" with Bigfoot.

Who knows??

Kirk.....:-)

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kevin Kichinka" <marsrox at gmail.com>
To: <meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2011 6:33 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] Bigfoot and the "Nakhla Dog" - what do they havein
common?


> Team Meteorite:
>
> While I am pursuing other projects now and can't take the time to
> again pursue/review or explain my peer-reviewed and published "thesis"
> (see David Weir "Meteorite Studies" and Nakhla) that absolves the
> Nakhla meteorite of "dogocide", one argument that was made in support
> of this crime against canines was that I "couldn't prove it DIDN'T
> HAPPEN."
>
>
> Never mind that no one recovered a bloody meteorite or a dead dog
> allegedly killed on the wrong day at the wrong place.
>
>
> Science and logic are brothers in arms. My brief, college-time
> exposure to "debate" (as a competition), taught me that if one argued
> this double negative, "by rule" you lost the debate. Something about
> being logical...
>
>
> Just for fun, I bring this up as I read on Yahoo about the world's
> "Top Ten unexplained things". Here's a quote from the article, please
> pay special attention to the last sentence:
>
>
> "For decades, large, hairy, manlike beasts called Bigfoot have
> occasionally been reported by eyewitnesses across America. Despite the
> thousands of Bigfoot that must exist for a breeding population, not a
> single body has been found. Not one has been killed by a hunter,
> struck dead by a speeding car, or even died of natural causes. In the
> absence of hard evidence like teeth or bones, support comes down to
> eyewitness sightings and ambiguous photos and films. Since it is
> logically impossible to prove a universal negative, science will never
> be able to prove that creatures like Bigfoot and the Loch Ness monster
> do not exist, and it is possible that these mysterious beasts lurk far
> from prying eyes."
>
>
> Very, very far indeed.
>
>
> Long live the Nakhla Dog.
>
>
> Thanks to all who sent me birthday greetings this week!
>
>
> Kevin Kichinka
> Tambor de Alajuela, Costa Rica
> www.theartofcollectingmeteorites.com
> www.LaQ-CostaRica.com
> ______________________________________________
> Visit the Archives at
> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Received on Sun 22 May 2011 07:46:39 PM PDT