[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Fw: Meteorite "worth"

To: mblood@access1.net, ams000@aztec.asu.edu
Subject: Re: Fw: Meteorite "worth"
From: Sharkkb8@aol.com
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 1999 02:18:56 EDT
CC: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Old-X-Envelope-To: <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
Reply-To: Sharkkb8@aol.com
Resent-Date: Wed, 7 Apr 1999 02:22:53 -0400 (EDT)
Resent-From: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Resent-Message-ID: <"r2r-qD.A.djB.JmvC3"@mu.pair.com>
Resent-Sender: meteorite-list-request@meteoritecentral.com


<< It seems to me y'all ar
 engaged in a sophmoric argument centered on semantics >>

Well Michael, at last count Steve S., Steve A., Peri, Tom, Stuart,
John, Larry, Gene, Julia, Geoff, and Dave (a pretty fair 
collection of talent, wouldn't you say?) have all seen fit
to contribute their individual <<sophomoric>> opinions
to the discussion  -  a not-inconsequential percentage of the
active members on the list.

<<One "argument" is as "valid" as the next>>

Surely you don't honestly believe that!

<<Debating who is "right" or "wrong" is futile>>

Funny, I thought this was a *discussion list*.   

Gregory

----------
Archives located at:
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/list_best.html

For help, FAQ's and sub. info. visit:
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing_list.html
----------

Prev by Date: Re: Mars again (and Lafayette)
Next by Date: Re: Monopoly and Institutional Arrogance (Humor/Sincere Mix)
Prev by thread: Re: Fw: Meteorite "worth"
Next by thread: Re: Fw: Meteorite "worth"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread