[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Geo vs Astro chemistry was Asteroid, Comet, etc. question

To: Mikestockj@aol.com
Subject: Re: Geo vs Astro chemistry was Asteroid, Comet, etc. question
From: Bernd Pauli HD <bernd.pauli@lehrer1.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 21:45:44 +0100
CC: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Old-X-Envelope-To: <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
References: <0.700fb277.256c2e23@aol.com>
Resent-Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 15:47:31 -0500 (EST)
Resent-From: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Resent-Message-ID: <SD827D.A.3rF.t0vO4@mu.pair.com>
Resent-Sender: meteorite-list-request@meteoritecentral.com

Mikestockj@aol.com schrieb:

Anthony et al. (1990) Handbook of Mineralogy, Vol. 1 - Elements Sulfides
Sulfosalts, p. 241, 256, 349, 510:

Details: "..."

Bob wrote:

> You brought up some very good points in both of your posts.


Hello Mike and List!

A resounding bravo from Germany. Thank you very much!
This is what the list should be like and what it should
be about - matter of fact information instead of personal
arguments, quibbles, petty and carping critiscism and the
like. Just my two (Euro-) cents :-)


Bernd

P.S.: Elton's latest post that just arrived is another example of
expertise and excellence. Bravo again!

----------
Archives located at:
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/list_best.html

For help, FAQ's and sub. info. visit:
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing_list.html
----------

References:

Re: Geo vs Astro chemistry was Asteroid, Comet, etc. question

From: Mikestockj@aol.com

Prev by Date: Re: Geo vs Astro chemistry was Asteroid, Comet, etc. question
Next by Date: Re: Geo vs Astro chemistry Errata
Prev by thread: Re: Geo vs Astro chemistry was Asteroid, Comet, etc. question
Next by thread: RE: Geo vs Astro chemistry was Asteroid, Comet, etc. question
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread