[meteorite-list] Global Warming - Scientifically provenor afarce

From: Martin Altmann <altmann_at_meteoritecentral.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:36:48 +0200
Message-ID: <015c01c7ad29$05641d20$e46dfea9_at_name86d88d87e2>

" H?tte man s?mtliche Berge der ganzen Welt,
zusammengetragen und ?bereinandergestellt
und w?re zu F??en dieses Massivs,
ein riesiges Meer, ein breites und tiefs.
Und st?rzte nun, unter Donnern und Blitzen
der Berg in dieses Meer ? na das w?rd? spritzen!"
Heinz Erhardt

Sorry, Jerry, no time for translation, Ensisheim is coming!

Martin

-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com
[mailto:meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com] Im Auftrag von Gerald
Flaherty
Gesendet: Dienstag, 12. Juni 2007 18:27
An: LITIG8NSHARK at aol.com; gmhupe at tampabay.rr.com; yankb04 at hotmail.com
Cc: Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
Betreff: Re: [meteorite-list] Global Warming - Scientifically provenor
afarce

"SOME say the world will end in fire
 Some say ice
 From what I've tasted of desire
 I'd hold those who favor fire
 But if it had to perish twice
 I think I know enough of hate
 To know that for destruction
 Ice is great
 And would suffice" Robert Frost AKA chillman

Jerry Flaherty
----- Original Message -----
From: <LITIG8NSHARK at aol.com>
To: <gmhupe at tampabay.rr.com>; <yankb04 at hotmail.com>
Cc: <Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com>
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 8:03 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Global Warming - Scientifically proven or
afarce


> Good evening Folks,
>
> Not wanting to intentionally stir the "pot of angst", I won't share my
> opinions regarding the validity of the global warming theory......in great

> part
> because it conflicts with the beliefs of roughly half of the List and,
> arguably,
> neither extreme (entirely pro or con) position is capable of clear and
> convincing scientific proof at this stage. And also, because, in greater
> part, I will
> admit that I am truly uncertain which argument has greater credibility.
>
> I would submit two widely held, and generally accepted, scientific
> theorems
> to consider before taking sides in this debate:
> 1. Entropy
> 2. Perpetual Motion
>
> Best regards,
>
> Paul Martyn
> Savannah GA
>
>
>
> ************************************** See what's free at
> http://www.aol.com.
> ______________________________________________
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

______________________________________________
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Received on Tue 12 Jun 2007 03:36:48 PM PDT